ad

 header image 2

IS PERFECTION ALL THERE IS?

December 30th, 2007 · 7 Comments

patriots_celebration_ia.jpg

Chris McGrath / Getty Images                                                                                                  The Patriots celebrate their record-breaking touchdown.

By Ron Borges

The Patriots hadn’t yet completed their remarkable 16-0 season and the drums were already beating to minimize what they had done. Sadly, that’s what society seems to have come to.

For weeks prior to their stirring, come-from-behind victory over the New York Giants Saturday night at, fittingly enough, Exit 16 W of the New Jersey Turnpike, any Patriot with cable TV or a radio heard some nitwit or other claiming that their prefect jaunt through the regular season would not mean much if they didn’t go on to win their fourth Super Bowl title of the decade.

That’s like saying dating Halle Berry, Alicia Keys and Giselle Bundchen wasn’t much of an accomplishment because Heidi Klum blew you off. It’s a ridiculous concept but one that we’ll hear more of between now and whenever the Patriots’ season ends.

Certainly if one asks if it’s more important to go 16-0 or win the Super Bowl, anyone would choose the latter over the former. Richard Seymour made that clear after the 38-35 victory over the Giants when he said his goal never was to go undefeated. His goal was to win the Super Bowl. But he added, in his usual well thought out manner, “When you walk away from the game, you say, ‘That’s special.’ Right now, I don’t know. I think it has to set in a little more. I think I may have to go home and watch it on TV. It was never a goal of ours to go 16-0. But to do it along the way, it definitely feels great.

“I don’t know how to really put it in perspective at this point right now. I think it’s something when you walk away from the game, one day, that you can look back upon and say, ‘That was a special team.’ Right now I don’t know how to look at it.”

Seymour was right on both fronts. They are a special t team and there is no way to yet put what going 16-0 means in a time so devotedly dedicated to mediocrity disguised as parity means. But the salient point is that regardless of what happens from here to Phoenix (site of this year’s Super Bowl) what this team has done cannot be minimized by a post-season defeat.

It can be expanded upon by three more victories, to be sure, and to say they are the equal of the NFL’s definition of perfection – the ’72 Dolphins – a Lombardi Trophy is required. But to say as NFL Network talking head Cris Collinsworth said during the broadcast Saturday night that the Patriots would have accomplished “nothing’’ if they lose in the post-season is to take to a ludicrous extreme the importance of a championship.

This is not the first time, nor will it be the last, where we are told that the only thing that counts, the only measurement, is a trophy. If that’s the case than the world is filled to overflowing with losers in life when the reality is that the opposite is true.

We will not waste too much time here lecturing on the importance of effort just as we won’t go too far overboard in praising the Giants for their effort IN TRYING TO WIN THE GAME because, after all, isn’t that why they play the games? To try and win?

The point is the Giants ennobled themselves and honored the Patriots’ accomplishment with their effort Saturday night and losing didn’t minimize what they accomplished. They could have laid down or head coach Tom Coughlin could have justified pulling his starters at any point by saying it was more important to win a wild-card playoff game in Tampa next weekend. Few would have argued with him.

But he would have been wrong if he’d done that just as it is wrong for people to argue that 16-0 is meaningless if one doesn’t end up 19-0. The fact is any team good enough to get into the playoffs is good enough (with the exception of whoever is the sixth seeds this year) to get hot and beat anybody.

You really believe the Chargers don’t feel they can beat the Patriots? You honestly think the Cowboys aren’t craving a return match with New England? And can you imagine the Patriots not respecting the Colts after the struggles those two teams have had over the past few seasons?

So to insist that anything less than 19-0 makes 16-0 meaningless is to be the kind of person that gets angry because he or she has to share their lottery winnings with someone else who hit the same number.

Winning the Super Bowl is the goal but any number of things can affect that. A ball bounces off the helmet of a defender and into those of one of his teammates and he returns the ball for a touchdown. A running back is walking in for the winning score and simply, inexplicably, drops the ball on the ground without being hit. An incomplete pass is scooped up by someone else before it hits the ground and instead of a celebration in one city we have an Immaculate Reception in another. A young player, pressed into action because of injuries to others, has a moment of doubt and is beaten on a big play at the worst of times. These things can happen but they would not lessen to nothingness a historic 16-week march to perfection.

So while it is legitimate to say, as Seymour did, that the goal was never 16-0 but rather winning the Lombardi Trophy it is not legitimate to babble, as one radio talking head blustered last week on WEEI’s Big Show, that the Patriots would be the laughing stocks of the NFL if they go undefeated in the regular season but fail to win the Super Bowl. Regardless of what happens from here on out, the Patriots became the rarest thing in sports. Perfect for a season.

Again, as far as last night’s game, we talked about it last night; it’s something that we can all be proud of in this organization,’’ Bill Belichick said this morning. “Everybody played a part in it. Everybody had a job to do. Certainly the players deserve the credit. They’re the ones that made the plays. It’s something that we can all be proud of. But we have a lot of football left to play and the next time we step on the field we’ll be 0-0 in the second season.’’

That’s what the playoffs really are - a second season. A season where anything can happen and often does. But whatever happens won’t change what happened in the first season.

A remarkable thing happened that no defeat can take away. The Patriots beat the second-best teams in the league on the road, Dallas and Indianapolis. They beat every playoff team they faced. They set records that won’t be challenged for years. Most of all, they won ‘em all.

That’s a whole lot more than “nothing’’ even if, in this new season, someone finally finds a way to beat them.

[Slashdot] [Digg] [Reddit] [del.icio.us] [Facebook] [Technorati] [Google] [StumbleUpon]

Tags: Game Predictions & Analysis · Football

7 responses so far ↓

  • 1 strazzerj // Jan 2, 2008 at 10:08 am

    Very well said! Thank you for a terrific article.

    I suspect some of the talking heads and even national commentators get confused by what someone on the Patriots feels compelled to say, and what they as media members should say.

    It’s understandable when the Patriots themselves wish to be focused solely on winning the Super Bowl, and thus minimize the accomplishment of 16-0.

    But the media aren’t focused on winning their next game. If they say 16-0 “means nothing”, then they are missing the point.

    If it really meant nothing, then why were so many opposing fans rooting so hard for the Patriots to lose?

  • 2 JamesLavin // Jan 2, 2008 at 3:59 pm

    Just read your “Pro Football Weekly” piece (http://www.profootballweekly.com/PFW/NFL/AFC/AFC+East/New+England/Features/2007/borges2226.htm, similar to above) and registered here just to compliment you on your superb article.

    I especially loved, “What the Giants did in battling their way to a 12-point second-half lead was honor the Patriots with their effort. What the Patriots did by overcoming it was honor themselves and their opponent while reminding the rest of us that perfection doesn’t come without pain, difficulty and doubt.”

    Wonderful stuff.

    –James Lavin

  • 3 baby armed assassin // Jan 2, 2008 at 7:14 pm

    Do you still believe Parcells, Gruden, Shanahan, Andy Reid, Jeff Fisher, Dick Vermeil, Brian Billick, and Tony Dungy are better coaches or was that the product of a pink smoothie headache?

  • 4 bostonboy9 // Jan 3, 2008 at 10:56 am

    Ron,
    Great article on the Patriots accomplishment being more than nothing if (God forbid) they don’t win the Superbowl. There is so much hatred out there against the Patriots, it is wonderful to read something positive. Thanks.

  • 5 Ron Borges // Jan 3, 2008 at 7:33 pm

    Baby Armed,
    Never said those guys were “better coaches.” I was asked who I’d rather have coaching my team and I listed them, Dungy being the first choice by the way not the last. You are one of those seemingly obsessed with the need for there to be one “best” coach, QB, sportswriter, etc. when that is seldom the case. You are entitled to your opinion, of course, as I am of mine. No? Of the coaches you mentino, BTW, only one, Parcells, took more than one team to the Super Bowl and all but Reid and Fisher won at least one.
    To Bostonboy9 and the others who agree with me that not winning the Super Bowl doesn’t negate all the Pats have done this year it’s good to see there are still fans out there who don’t buy into the idea that you win it all or you win nothing.

  • 6 hieronymus // Jan 4, 2008 at 2:26 pm

    Came in to say what the others said, enjoyed the heck out of the article.

    I especially appreciate you calling out the commentator who - last I checked - continues to use the phrase “laughing stock” to describe the Patriots should they lose a game from here on out.

    Nothing could be further from the truth, and the “journalist” in question should be smart enough to know it.

  • 7 baby armed assassin // Jan 5, 2008 at 5:34 pm

    Ron,

    Though you’ll never admit it because of blind hatred and a quixote-like quest to deride Belichick at every opportunity, the fact is that performance over time does ultimately determine better. Be it on a football field, in a newsroom, or sitting around a conference table. To put forth that you can’t determine better when you’ve spent so much time immediately criticizing decisions as poor that ultimately proved you wrong(Seymour, Light, Warren, Vrabel, Law, Branch, McGinest, Milloy, Bledsoe, etc., etc., etc.) with less empirical evidence is about as intellectually dishonest as it gets. Some would say you are a fraud for it.

You must log in to post a comment.